Circular Logic

Learn what circular reasoning is, how to identify it, and why it is a fallacy. See examples of circular reasoning, tautology, circular definition, circular reference, and self-referencing in logic and language.

Circular reasoning Latin circulus in probando, quotcircle in provingquot 1 also known as circular logic is a logical fallacy in which the reasoner begins with what they are trying to end with. 2 Circular reasoning is not a formal logical fallacy, but a pragmatic defect in an argument whereby the premises are just as much in need of proof or evidence as the conclusion. As a consequence, the

Circular reasoning in informal logic is an argument that commits the logical fallacy of assuming what it is attempting to prove.

Learn what circular logic is, how it differs from tautology and pleonasm, and why it is a logical fallacy. See examples of circular logic in everyday speech, arguments, and propaganda.

Circular argument, logical fallacy in which the premise of an argument assumes the conclusion to be true. A circular argument's premise explicitly or implicitly assumes that its conclusion is true rather than providing any supporting statements. If the conclusion and premise were switched, the

Learn what circular reasoning is and how to spot it in arguments, politics, and literature. Find out how to avoid and refute this informal fallacy with evidence and logic.

Learn about circular reasoning, a common logical fallacy. Discover clear examples, how it works, and use our infographic to identify it in everyday arguments.

Learn what circular reasoning is and how to spot it in arguments. A circular reasoning fallacy is when an argument assumes its own conclusion as evidence, making it logically invalid.

Circular logic, a common logical fallacy in everyday conversations, hinders clear and effective arguments. It occurs when someone attempts to justify a claim by simply restating it in different words. Imagine a circle - the argument starts and ends at the same point, offering no real progression or additional evidence.

Circular reasoning is a logical fallacy that uses a claim to support itself. Learn what it is, how to spot it, and why it's flawed with 29 examples and tips to avoid it.