React Feature Based Structure

We will discuss the following ways to structure react components. Table of Content. 1. Feature-based Structure 2. File and Folder Structure 3. Component-Based Architecture In this approach, components are organized based on features or functionality rather than their type e.g., pages, modals, forms. Each feature folder contains all

This post explores how these folder structures evolve in a growing codebase, the problems they can cause, best practices, and a challenge to turn a design from the React Job Simulator into a feature-based folder structure. For an example project with the final feature-based folder structure, check out this GitHub repository.

To structure a React project using FDD, you can follow these steps features This is where the core functionality of your application is organized based on features. Each feature e.g

Using Feature-Based vs. File-Based Structures. When organizing a React project, there are two common patterns to consider feature-based and file-based structures. Deciding which one to use depends on the size, complexity, and nature of your application. File-Based Structure. A file-based structure groups files by their type.

Directory Structure src features Authentication LoginForm.js LogoutButton.js RegisterForm.js useAuth.js Adopting a feature-based architecture in React applications offers numerous benefits

Feature-Driven Development FDD has become more prevalent in today's landscape, and for good reason!This is a lightweight Agile technique, manifest in a project structure where your code is organized by what it accomplishes i.e. features, rather than lumping all modules of like types into separate blobs of components, routes, logic, actions, etc.

Feature-Based React Components. In a typical application, we will have a database with multiple tables that are related to each other. For example, a blog application might have a users table, a posts table, and a comments table. The posts table might have a foreign key to the users table, and the comments table might have foreign keys to both the users and posts tables.

Features, at this point, can almost be seen as quotcomponentsquot of application structure. What about shared code? Shared code can and should still exist in a feature based paradigm. There are some things that benefit many features and those could live in a quotsharedquot directory. A non-exhaustive example

Choosing the right folder structure in React projects is essential and should be based on the project's size and complexity. While quotLevel 1quot may suffice for small projects, quotLevel 2quot and quotLevel 3quot offer more organized and modular structures for medium and large projects. Personally, I'd often recommend the quotLevel 2quot folder structure.

For example, on a large project for Accenture, I implemented a combination of feature-based and module-based folders to keep my code organized and easy to navigate. In this code structure, a large-scale React app that resembles a social media platform like Facebook is designed to be scalable, maintainable, and easy to navigate.